Which Colleges Are Most at Risk?

We built a financial stress score from three variables (enrollment trend, tuition dependency, and cash reserves) and scored 4,000+ institutions from College Scorecard and IPEDS data. The score separates survivors from closures pretty cleanly.

Stress Score Distribution

Where Do Closures Cluster?

The histogram below shows the distribution of financial stress scores for operating institutions (blue) and those that have closed (rose). Closures cluster almost exclusively above a score of 85. The vast majority of the distribution is invisible to institutions in the "safe" range.

Stress Score Distribution: Operating vs. Closed
Finding
A 3-variable rule catches 75% of closures. Institutions with a stress score above 85 account for nearly all closures, while thousands of institutions below that threshold have experienced none.

Financial stress score: enrollment trend (5-year CAGR) + tuition dependency (tuition revenue / total revenue) + days cash on hand. Scored 0–100, higher = more stressed.

Risk Tier Breakdown

How Many Are in the Danger Zone?

We grouped institutions into four tiers based on stress score. Over half of all institutions fall into the Critical tier, and that tier contains every single closure in the dataset.

Institutions by Risk Tier

The Critical tier is where all the action is. All 244 closures in the dataset occurred among institutions with a stress score above 75. The Low, Moderate, and High tiers have zero closures combined. This extreme concentration is what makes a simple threshold rule work so well.

Watchlist

Top 20 At-Risk Operating Institutions

These are the 20 currently-operating institutions with the highest financial stress scores. The pattern is clear: small enrollment, near-total tuition dependency, minimal cash reserves.

Institution State Sector Enrollment Score Tuition Dep. Days Cash

Source: College Scorecard and IPEDS 2015–2023 data. Stress score computed from enrollment trend (5-year CAGR), tuition dependency ratio, and days cash on hand.

Model Validation

How Good Is This Simple Rule?

The 3-variable stress score with a threshold of 75 captures 93% of actual closures (recall) with a precision of 33%. That means for every 3 institutions flagged as high risk, roughly 1 actually closed. The false-positive rate is high, but in an early-warning system, that's acceptable. You'd rather flag too many than miss the ones that close.

A simple model works here because the signal is strong and the dataset is small. A 3-variable rule with no machine learning, no tuning, and no black-box complexity catches 93% of closures. The ML model (Q5) improves this by ~7 percentage points in AUC, which is real but modest. The simple model is the right starting point because it's explainable and cheap to maintain.