Skip to main content
Ocean Acoustics → Investigation 05

Can Whales Still Hear Each Other?

The regulations set a shutdown zone at 5 km to prevent injury. But pile driving noise travels far beyond that — raising the acoustic floor across tens of thousands of square kilometers. A right whale 50 km away is safe from harassment. It is not safe from silence.

14×
Masking vs Shutdown
80 km
Masking Radius
20,000 km²
Masking Area
100%
Corridor Masked
The Regulatory Framework

What the Rules Actually Protect

The Marine Mammal Protection Act defines two levels of harassment. Level A is physical injury — permanent threshold shift in hearing. Level B is behavioral disruption — defined as exposure above 160 dB re 1 μPa.

The Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) sets a shutdown zone — approximately 5.7 km radius with standard 6 dB attenuation — where pile driving must cease if a right whale is detected. Within this zone, the received level exceeds the Level B threshold. Outside it, the whale is considered unaffected.

This framework protects whales from direct acoustic injury. It does not ask whether they can still communicate.

Communication Masking

The Sound That Fills the Gap

North Atlantic right whales produce upcalls — frequency-modulated contact calls between 50 and 500 Hz — at a source level of approximately 160 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m. These calls are how mothers find calves, how individuals maintain group cohesion, and how the population coordinates during migration.

Pile driving produces broadband noise in the same 50–500 Hz frequency band. For a whale to detect another whale’s call, the call must arrive at least 8 dB above the ambient noise floor — the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required for auditory detection.

Pile driving raises the noise floor. When the noise floor rises above the received level of an incoming whale call minus 8 dB, the call is masked. The whale is not injured. It simply cannot hear the other whale.

The Scale Mismatch

Two Zones from the Same Model

The shutdown zone and the masking zone come from the same RAM PE propagation model. The physics is identical. The only difference is the question.

Shutdown Zone
~5.7 km
IHA regulatory shutdown radius (6 dB attenuation)
~102 km² area
Masking Zone
~80 km
Radius where pile noise exceeds whale call SNR threshold
~20,000 km² area
Ratio
14×
The masking zone radius is 14 times the regulatory shutdown zone
~200× area ratio

The 80 km masking zone is computed at the baseline (pre-inversion) bottom parameters. Investigation 08 (Bayesian inversion) suggests the actual zone may be ~60 km with data-constrained bottom properties. The qualitative finding (masking zone >> shutdown zone) is robust to this uncertainty.

A whale at 50 km from the pile — ten times outside the shutdown zone, safe by every regulatory standard — cannot hear another whale calling. The call arrives below the noise floor. The whale is not harassed. It is acoustically isolated.

RAM PE propagation · CUDEM bathymetry (31m res) · WOA2023 sound speed profiles · 10 dB bubble curtain mitigation assumed · Masking threshold derivation: ambient noise ~105 dB re 1 μPa in the 50–500 Hz band (typical shallow continental shelf; see Wenz, 1962) + 8–10 dB SNR required for upcall detection (Clark et al., 2009; Parks et al., 2011) = masking above ~115 dB received level

Ambient noise uncertainty. The masking zone is at least as uncertain as the shutdown zone: it depends on both propagation uncertainty and ambient noise uncertainty. Ambient noise on the US East Coast continental shelf varies 10–15 dB with shipping density, wind state, and biological noise. The 105 dB baseline represents moderate conditions; busy shipping lanes or calm conditions could shift the masking threshold — and thus the masking zone — by ±30%.

Model Validation

RAM PE Confirms the Estimate

The masking zone was computed by running the RAM PE parabolic equation solver to 100 km at the Vineyard Wind site using real CUDEM bathymetry and WOA2023 sound speed profiles. The RAM PE model shows that shallow-water propagation on the continental shelf maintains higher noise levels at long range than simple spreading laws predict — sound energy is trapped between the surface and the bottom, creating a waveguide effect. At 80 km, the received pile driving noise still exceeds the threshold for masking whale communication.

Received Level vs Range: RAM PE Output (Vineyard Wind, October, 210 dB source)

Actual RAM PE broadband output (azimuth 0, October SSP, CUDEM bathymetry). The oscillatory pattern is real multipath interference from shallow-water propagation — sound bouncing between the surface and seafloor creates constructive and destructive interference at different ranges. Source level: 210 dB SPLrms re 1 μPa (10–12 dB bubble curtain from ~222 dB unmitigated per Rand Acoustics).

Red shaded band: masking threshold uncertainty due to ambient noise variability (±10 dB per Wenz 1962). Quiet conditions (~95 dB ambient) shift the masking threshold down to ~105 dB, extending the masking zone beyond 100 km. Heavy shipping (~115 dB ambient) raises it to ~125 dB, shrinking the zone to ~55 km. The 80 km estimate uses moderate-condition ambient of ~105 dB.

Cumulative Impact

11 Projects Tile the Entire Corridor

Each project creates a masking zone of approximately 80 km radius. The US East Coast has 11 active or permitted offshore wind projects spanning from Virginia to Massachusetts. The NARW migration corridor along this coast is approximately 660 km.

If even a fraction of these projects conduct pile driving simultaneously — which current schedules allow, since each IHA is reviewed independently — their masking zones overlap. With simultaneous construction at five or more projects, 100% of the 660 km migration corridor falls within at least one masking zone.

There is no quiet path. A right whale migrating from Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras would travel through continuous noise for the entire journey. It could not hear another whale at any point along the route.

Masking Coverage of Migration Corridor by Number of Simultaneous Projects
Acoustic Refuge

How Much Quiet Shelf Remains?

With all 11 projects piling simultaneously, only 30% of the continental shelf between Virginia and Massachusetts falls below the masking threshold. The remaining 70% is acoustically compromised — whales in those areas cannot maintain the 8 dB SNR needed for call detection.

The 30% that remains quiet is concentrated in the deepest offshore areas and the far northern and southern ends of the shelf — regions where right whale density is lowest. The high-density habitat areas are the first to be masked because they overlap directly with the wind energy lease areas.

The per-project IHA evaluates whether one project’s shutdown zone overlaps with another’s. At 5.7 km, it never does — adjacent lease areas are 30+ km apart. At 80 km, every project overlaps with its neighbors. The regulatory unit of analysis is too small to see the cumulative impact.

Finding
The shutdown zone is 5.7 km. The masking zone is 80 km. The regulatory framework protects whales from injury but not from losing the ability to communicate. With 11 projects, 100% of the 660 km migration corridor is masked during simultaneous construction.

This is not an argument against offshore wind. It is an argument for managing construction acoustics at the corridor scale, not the project scale. The transition to clean energy and marine mammal conservation are both essential. They can coexist — but only if the regulatory process looks beyond individual project boundaries.

RAM PE propagation · CUDEM bathymetry (31m res) · WOA2023 sound speed profiles · NARW upcall source level 160 dB · 50–500 Hz band · 8 dB SNR detection threshold · 11 active/permitted lease areas · Masking zone = 80 km radius per RAM PE